Have you ever been told to execute on a project wherein the
kick-off meeting all parties were smiling, nodding their heads and voicing
their enthusiasm about the project? Have you then later experienced some of
these same seemingly enthusiastic and approving people seem to be doing
everything they can to not support the effort?
Surprisingly, this is not all that uncommon an experience in
project management. Hence, it’s critical for any project manager – official or
otherwise – to identify who the real supporters
are in a project. And, conversely, have contingency plans for working around
those who aren’t – regardless of what they may say.
Case in point; a recent project I participated in required
the input of a given person. My client – the project’s champion - required me
to route any and all things through this one person and kept me dependent on
them for any information, materials, access to expertise and so on.
During the initial consultation with all parties, this
person made several statements expressing agreement with the need for this
project, the need for an outside consultant to come in (nobody internal had enough
time to devote to the project so it would complete) and so on. However, when it came down to it, despite
multiple requests from me, this person gave me next to nothing in any of these
areas. And the project stalled as a result. So, was this person truly as “on board” with the project goals as they
had seemed to be? Or, is the reality the person is a project saboteur (unintentionally
or perhaps otherwise)?
This person is an example of the kinds of barriers to
progress that project managers need to identify and quickly so to keep a
project moving towards completion. And have a counter to, but that’s a subject
for another blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment