In my previous post (Who's really on
the team...? (Introduction))
I pointed out that it’s sometimes hard for a project manager to know who is
really supportive of a project’s goals and timelines and who isn’t. In other
words, who is in reality saying “no” by saying “yes?”
While this can honestly be about as easy as “sorting fly poop out
of black pepper,” it is critically important that a project manager go into the
project looking for these folks. Not trying to advocate being pessimistic or
paranoid, but if one or more of these kinds of people are involved in your
project, it’s at risk. Plain and simple.
So…. How to figure out who these folks might be? Start with those
who will be most affected by the change. Case in point; I was once a training
manager for an FAA Part 135 air carrier. That’s more or less an airline - the
big differences being the class of equipment (i.e., business jets and turboprop
twins instead of 777s or Airbus 380s) and lack of a set schedule of routes and
times. It was, as the industry terms it, “an on-demand charter operation.”
Most of our pilots were not employees of our charter company.
Instead they were employed by someone who owned the business jet that used it
in conjunction with their business most of the time but allowed it and their pilots
to fly it for our charter company part time. The idea here was the owner got
some extra revenue from his airplane through charter to help offset their cost
of ownership.
Unfortunately, I saw way more instances than I really care to
remember where our salesperson would take the owner and pilots out for a big
expensive meal to help woo them into joining our charter ticket. As the wine
flowed and the conversation centered around all the wonderful revenues said
owner would receive from all these extra charter trips they could fly with their
airplane (and their pilots) over and above their normal business trips.
Invariably the owner and his crews would all be saying “Yes, yes,
yes. We can do this! Sign us up!”
By now you’re probably already guessing the
end of the story. The level of participation agreed to by these pilots
sometimes didn’t live up to that promised.
Why? Picture this; you’re this owner’s pilots. You’ve just flown into
home base from a long 4-day, 3-night trip. You’re looking forward to a little
relaxation and time with the family. You haven’t been in the same state as your
own home 6 hours and you get called from the charter company wanting you to
head back out for another long charter trip – for which you’ll receive no extra
pay. And this is the 4th such call you’ve gotten this month. How
motivated are you to accept the trip?
So, in this scenario, all these pilots got from their boss
enthusiastically adding their aircraft to our charter certificate was what
amounted to an extra part-time-plus job…for no money. Is it hard to believe that
– despite their enthusiastic support of his signing the charter contract during
the wine and steaks dinner - they’d turn down charter trips whenever possible.
Therefore, always keep your eyes open for the reasons why those “on
the team” wouldn’t really want to support the team. Maybe it's job insecurity, maybe it's loss of status. Or maybe they just think the project will bring them more hassle. Whatever their objections might be, if possible, remove those
objections for the health of the project.
No comments:
Post a Comment